Trump: No Dismissals for Officials Linked to Leaked Signal Chat

Trump Defends National Security Adviser Amid Controversy Over Yemen Airstrike Leak

In a recent interview with NBC News’ Kristen Welker, former President Donald Trump addressed the fallout from an incident in which sensitive information regarding U.S. airstrike plans in Yemen was inadvertently disclosed in a group chat. Trump confirmed that he would not dismiss any staff members involved in the situation, specifically defending Michael Waltz, the national security adviser who was implicated in the matter.

The controversy erupted when Waltz accidentally included Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, in a private group chat on Signal — a secure messaging app. This chat contained confidential discussions ahead of U.S. military operations targeting the Iranian-backed Houthi militia in Yemen, which were executed on March 15. Reports indicated that Trump had sought advice from his aides throughout the week about whether firing Waltz was necessary due to the leak’s repercussions and the ensuing public scrutiny.

However, during the NBC interview, Trump underscored his support for Waltz and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, expressing confidence in their capabilities despite the incident’s negative media coverage. “I don’t fire people because of fake news and because of witch hunts,” Trump stated, downplaying the gravity of the situation. This declaration signifies his ongoing pattern of resisting staff changes in response to perceived media attacks — a stance he has upheld since his presidency.

The former president also touched on other pressing matters during the wide-ranging interview, most notably the U.S. relationship with Greenland. This discussion came on the heels of Vice President JD Vance’s recent visit to an American military base located on the island, a territory that is currently under Danish semi-autonomy. Trump reiterated his controversial stance on Greenland, indicating that he has not ruled out the possibility of using force to annex the territory, though he expressed a preference for negotiating a deal instead.

When prompted to reflect on the potential implications of such a move on global perceptions, including reactions from Russia, Trump candidly stated, “I don’t really think about that; I don’t really care.” This response underscores his unapologetic and direct approach to foreign policy decisions, often prioritizing American interests over international perceptions.

In addition to these topics, Trump addressed the impending new tariffs on automobiles, set to take effect soon. He remarked that he “couldn’t care less” about the possibility of automakers raising vehicle prices due to the increased costs of importing cars and parts. Advocating for American manufacturing, Trump maintained that he believes these tariffs would ultimately incentivize consumers to purchase domestically produced vehicles.

Despite nearly half of all vehicles sold in the U.S. being imported and around 60% of car parts used in domestic manufacturing also coming from abroad, Trump expressed optimism about American automakers’ ability to adjust. He dismissed a report alleging that he warned auto executives against raising prices in light of the new tariffs, reiterating his belief in the ferocity of the American auto market.

“I couldn’t care less,” he reiterated during the interview. “I hope they raise their prices because if they do, people are going to buy American-made cars. We have plenty.” This statement reflects Trump’s longstanding commitment to promoting American industry and protecting jobs, even at the risk of increased consumer costs.

The interview comes amid an environment of heightened scrutiny on Trump and his administration’s policies, particularly regarding national security and trade. As media outlets continue to examine the implications of recent events, Trump’s responses reveal a consistent approach of valuing loyalty and American interests, often dismissing criticism from the press and political adversaries.

With these developments unfolding against a backdrop of ongoing partisan tension in Washington, it is evident that Trump remains undeterred in his stance, advocating for policies that align with his vision of America’s place in the world. As the political landscape evolves, the ramifications of his decisions, particularly regarding military engagements and economic strategies, will likely continue to shape discussions among policymakers and the public alike.