Criticism of Treatment of Deportees in Costa Rica: Ombudsman Report Highlights Distress Among Migrants
A recent report released by Costa Rica’s ombudsman has shed light on the troubling experiences of 135 migrants who were deported to the country from the United States. Many of these individuals arrived in Costa Rica in a state of confusion, expressing significant distress as they searched for communication with their relatives to explain their dire circumstances.
The report, which became public on Friday, emphasizes the plight of these deportees upon their arrival at an international airport located outside the capital, San José. According to the findings, numerous deportees, including children, exhibited visible signs of distress. A notable concern highlighted in the report is that many migrants arrived without their personal documents, which complicated efforts to verify familial connections.
The ambiguity surrounding the status of these documents—whether they were confiscated by American or Costa Rican authorities—remains unclear. This uncertainty added to the difficulties faced by the deportees, who were already in an emotionally taxing situation.
The group of migrants sent to Costa Rica comprises individuals largely from regions like Asia and the Middle East. This recent influx, initiated under the Trump administration, has seen more than half of these deportees coming from countries like Uzbekistan, China, and Armenia. U.S. officials assert that these individuals crossed the U.S. border illegally, leading to their deportation to Central America.
Following their arrival, Costa Rica’s security minister, Mario Zamora, publicly disputed the claims made in the ombudsman’s report. He argued that the assessment of the migrants’ conditions was based on a limited timeframe—a mere two hours after their landing—rather than considering their experience upon reaching the Temporary Attention Center for Migrants, a facility located several hours south of the capital. In his statement, he expressed regret that the ombudsman’s office did not accompany the migrants on their journey, a responsibility he believes they should have fulfilled.
The ombudsman’s report also issued critical remarks directed at the United States, highlighting that many deportees reported a lack of information regarding their transfer to Costa Rica. Specifically, they expressed confusion about the length of their stay in the country and the migration procedures they would have to undergo. This absence of essential information exacerbated the already high levels of distress among the migrants.
In response to the allegations, Minister Zamora emphasized that an assessment of the migrants’ conditions should have taken place once they arrived at the government’s facility, designed to house them temporarily until their repatriation or asylum requests are processed. He noted that personnel from the United Nations and translators were on hand to assist the deportees in understanding their situation in light of international migration law.
Despite the government’s assertions of adequate care, the ombudsman’s office reported that while basic hygiene supplies, food, and necessities for children were provided, the conditions surrounding the migrants’ travel were unjust, particularly for the younger children. After lengthy air travel, they were placed on buses for an additional six-to-seven-hour journey, leaving many children exhausted and hungry. Mothers reported that their children had not been able to sleep properly and were in need of nourishment.
The report also highlighted that some migrants needed emotional support upon arrival; however, they did not receive proper medical or psychological evaluations during their initial hours in the country. This oversight raised concerns about the overall treatment and care of vulnerable populations who are often fleeing dangerous situations in their home countries.
As a counterpoint, Minister Zamora stated that all migrants were evaluated individually by Friday morning, implying that the needs of the deportees were eventually attended to. This response underscores the contrasting narratives presented by the government and the ombudsman’s office regarding the treatment and welfare of the deportees.
The report concluded with a call for reflection on the events described, emphasizing the importance of Costa Rica maintaining its historical commitment to human rights and humanitarian assistance. The ombudsman’s office, an independent government entity established to protect the rights of individuals within the country, reaffirmed its dedication to advocating for the welfare of migrants, particularly in light of international migration trends that have seen several countries in Central America, including Costa Rica, accept deportees from the United States.
The recent developments have put a spotlight on the broader implications of immigration policies and the humanitarian responsibilities that nations must uphold, particularly for those fleeing persecution and seeking safety. This situation resonates with similar cases in neighboring countries, such as Panama, which recently received flights carrying hundreds of migrants from distant countries, including China and Iran, highlighting a growing regional trend in the handling of international migration challenges.