Trump’s Targets Fear Retribution in Potential Second Term

As Donald J. Trump prepares to take office once again, the atmosphere in Washington is marked by palpable anxiety among his critics and those who have sought to hold him accountable. Trump’s return is overshadowed by his promises to investigate and retaliate against adversaries, particularly those involved in the congressional investigation into the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack and the multiple prosecutions he has faced.

In recent statements, Trump has made it clear that he intends to use his presidential power not just for governance, but to exact “vengeance” on his perceived enemies. This rhetoric has sparked fear among many in the political sphere, who worry about the implications of Trump’s threats. For example, Michael Fanone, a former police officer attacked by Trump supporters during the January 6 riot, expressed concerns that the danger he and his family face will escalate following Trump’s return to power.

“I fear that people might think if they attack me or my family, Donald Trump will absolve them of their actions,” Fanone said, highlighting the potential for increased violence and intimidation against those who oppose the former president.

The New York Times reached out to numerous prominent figures who have been vocal critics of Trump. Most, however, opted not to speak on the record, fearing that doing so would make them targets for retaliation. Those who spoke anonymously shared worries about potential investigations by the Justice Department or FBI into their actions during their professional duties, despite having acted within the law. The fact that Kash Patel, Trump’s pick to lead the FBI, has previously published an enemies list only heightens their concerns.

In addition to fears of government investigations, many are apprehensive about losing jobs or clients in the private sector. Some critics, like Fanone, worry that Trump supporters might act on his calls for retribution and harass or attack them or their families. The idea that Trump might pardon some of the January 6 rioters has further deepened fears about the erosion of legal norms.

Although Trump’s aides have suggested that he might not act on all his threats, the fear among his opponents remains. Trump himself has indicated that he is not focused on punishing critics but his rhetoric and past actions have led many to believe otherwise. Historical context shows that during Trump’s initial term, many adversaries faced scrutiny from law enforcement due to his frequent calls for investigations.

Even as Trump signals possible retaliation, some of his supporters seem eager to do the work for him. Recently, House Republicans suggested that Liz Cheney, a prominent figure in the January 6 inquiry, should face an FBI investigation. Additionally, congressional Republicans have contemplated demanding testimony from Jack Smith, the special counsel involved in investigating Trump.

Trump’s adversaries have expressed that the fear of retaliation is already stifling public criticism, influencing corporate leaders and other prominent individuals who previously opposed Trump to now signal their support. Meanwhile, some of his former aides express that they are engaging in psychological warfare against critics, enjoying the power shift as they seek to intimidate those who opposed them in the past.

Many officials, particularly those who were prominent in the Biden administration, are already implementing defensive measures. Their concerns about retribution extend beyond merely losing positions; some have even purchased firearms out of fear for their safety. The psychological impact of Trump’s return is causing a reevaluation of security among critics, with many seeking legal representation in anticipation of potential investigations.

Amidst persistent fears, some individuals have decided to act. A former deputy national security adviser has chosen to speak openly about Trump’s allies’ attempts to target critics, emphasizing the importance of transparency regarding their qualifications for government roles.

The incoming administration has gauged the mood, recognizing that while some concerns about a mass exodus from the Justice Department have yet to materialize, individuals are still wary of their future under a Trump presidency. Preparations for responses to potential government overreach are underway, with many identified as past targets of Trump’s ire receiving legal advice on how to navigate the precarious political landscape.

As Trump embarks on this new term, the implications of his leadership style loom large over those who have positioned themselves as his opponents. The potential for vindictive actions continues to cast a long shadow over the political landscape, with many left to navigate the uncertain terrain of a Trump-led government once more. The fear and trepidation that accompany his return are palpable as Washington braces for the unfolding political drama.